Skip to content
RegionSub-Saharan Africa

MediumI Geo-Economics & Chokepoints8 October 2026, Thursday

Container lines return to Suez despite a slim 43-dollar slot saving

Container lines are returning to Suez faster than expected, according to a Drewry report on 8 October. Yet using the canal instead of the Cape of Good Hope saves only about 43 dollars per slot. The real gain is time: an Asia–North Europe round voyage drops from 124 days to 97.

Location: SUEZ

Drewry's report of 8 October, cited by Breakbulk News, says routing a 24,000 TEU ship through Suez instead of round the Cape saves about 1 million dollars per round voyage. That works out at about 43 dollars per container slot. Operating costs fall from 18 million to 17 million dollars, about 6%, and distance drops from 29,711 nautical miles to 21,878. Drewry says lines are returning mainly because of the 27-day time saving, vessel utilisation and competitive pressure. MSC, CMA CGM, Maersk, Ocean Alliance and Gemini Cooperation are among those returning.

Insurance could wipe out the saving. Drewry calculates that for a container ship worth 225 million dollars, a war risk premium of 0.3% adds 1.35 million dollars over two transits, and a 1% premium adds 4.5 million. That can exceed the 1 million dollar gain. The canal's 15% and 25% rebates save about 365,000 and 600,000 dollars respectively. Drewry's base case has Suez container transits reaching 80% of pre-diversion levels in February 2027. It ties the return to a cautious operational adjustment, not to the Red Sea being deemed fully safe.

Sources diverge on which direction is returning. Breakbulk says some services use Suez only on eastbound backhaul legs. Translindo's commentary on 9 October says westbound Asia–North Europe services returned in early October, while eastbound sailings still go round the Cape. Translindo says Suez transits rose 28% year on year in August, the busiest month since December 2023, while Bab el-Mandeb transits fell 49% on the previous month. The Africa Center for Strategic Studies has recorded 12 attacks or attempts in the southern Red Sea since July.

Talay assessment

Bottom line

The return to Suez is driven by time, not cost, so even a 1% war risk premium could reverse the economics. Fighting along the Bab el-Mandeb coast and unverified reports of mines are the weakest link in the return. The likeliest path is a slow, direction-by-direction return that would unwind after a single successful attack.

Likely effects

  • Asia–Europe freightPositive1–6 months

    Shorter voyages release capacity and push spot rates down; Translindo says spot rates have started to fall.

  • EgyptPositive1–6 months

    As transits approach the 80% mark, Suez Canal revenue recovers and Egypt's foreign currency gap eases.

  • TürkiyePositive1–6 months

    The shorter route cuts costs for Mediterranean ports and Turkish exporters' Asia-linked logistics; a new attack in the Red Sea would quickly erase that gain.

Possibilities, ranked

  1. 1
    Slow return continues55%

    Lines return to Suez direction by direction, with transits reaching a 70–80% band by February 2027.

    Watch: Monthly Suez Canal container transit data

  2. 2
    Reversal after an attack30%

    A successful attack in the southern Red Sea sends the major lines back round the Cape.

    Watch: UKMTO reporting a hit on a merchant ship near Bab el-Mandeb

  3. 3
    Rapid normalisation15%

    Control of the Yemeni coast becomes clear, the war risk premium falls below 0.3% and the return speeds up.

    Watch: Red Sea war risk pricing in the Lloyd's market

Probabilities are calibrated judgement based on the sources, not measurement, and are revised as new information arrives. Not investment advice.

Market reaction

Indicators affected

Historical context

Suez Canal transits, last 6 months

172839506128/0523/0619/0713/0808/0904/10

Sources

  1. Breakbulk News — Container lines return to Suez despite $43 per slot saving as Drewry warns of Red Sea risks
  2. Translindo Group — Ships are returning to the Red Sea: is the crisis over?