
III Kinetic Conflicts & DefenceSub-Saharan Africa
"The Alliance for Survival": Eritrea's proxy coalition as seen from Addis Ababa
- Institution
- Horn Review
- Author
- Amanuel Tadesse
- Country · language
- Ethiopia · English
- Affiliation
- Independent publishing platform (Addis)
Summary
In a piece published on 23 September, the day Tigrayan forces took Mekelle airport, international law and foreign affairs specialist Amanuel Tadesse reads the Ethiopian People's Forces Alliance for Survival, declared on 20 September, as a proxy coalition assembled by Eritrea. According to the author, the alliance comprises seven organisations: the TPLF, the Oromo Liberation Army, the Amhara Fano National Movement, the Ogaden National Liberation Front, the Afar Revolutionary Democratic Unity Front, and the Benishangul and Gumuz movements. Tadesse regards it as the product of Eritrea's doctrine of expanding its sphere of influence through cross-border militarisation, buffer zones and non-state actors, in other words "transnational power projection".
As evidence, the author points to secret consultations he says were held in Asmara in August 2026 with TPLF Politburo Chairman Debretsion Gebremichael, a coordination meeting allegedly held in Gulo Mekeda between the TPLF and Eritrean military officials after the 2 August Shererina incident, and a "Transitional Government Roadmap" he claims Eritrea drafted. His recommendations: close intelligence monitoring of Eritrean activities, exploiting ideological rifts within the alliance to encourage fighters to switch sides, making evidence of the secret meetings public, and international documentation of Eritrean interference. The key claims rest on anonymous sources and sources attributed to Ethiopian officials; Eritrea's response is not included.
Blind spot
What the West misses: the West mostly reads the Tigray crisis as non-implementation of the Pretoria Agreement or internal rivalry; the dominant reading in Addis Ababa frames it as an Eritrea-driven interstate threat, laying the groundwork for steps against Eritrea. Weakness: the piece aligns with federal government theses, its key evidence is anonymous and unverified, and it omits the reasoning of Eritrea and the alliance members.
Talay assessment
Bottom line
The piece shows the strengthening in Ethiopia of a framing that presents the crisis as external Eritrean interference rather than civil war. This narrative gives the government legitimacy for diplomatic and military steps against Eritrea; however, unless the evidence is disclosed, international support will remain limited. The most likely path is continued accusations while a direct interstate war is avoided for now.
Likely effects
- Ethiopia–Eritrea relationsNegative1–6 months
Presenting the alliance as Eritrea's proxy increases the risk that the conflict in Tigray escalates into a direct clash between the two states.
- MediationNegativeWeeks
Framing the conflict as external interference deepens Addis Ababa's reluctance to negotiate directly with alliance members and complicates the African Union process.
- Red Sea securityNegative1–6 months
Because Ethiopia–Eritrea tension would extend to the Red Sea coast, it magnifies risks for Türkiye and the Gulf states, which have port and trade interests in the region.
Possibilities, ranked
- 1War of accusations, no direct clash55%
Addis Ababa keeps accusing Eritrea but launches no cross-border operation; fighting stays confined to Tigray and Afar.
Watch: Whether the Ethiopian government publishes evidence concerning Eritrea
- 2Interstate escalation30%
The federal government takes military steps on the Eritrean border and the conflict spreads to the two states.
Watch: Reports of a military build-up on the Eritrean border or a cross-border attack
- 3Alliance unravels15%
As recommended, rifts within the alliance deepen and some groups switch sides or sit down with the government.
Watch: An alliance member organisation announcing its departure or the start of negotiations
Probabilities are calibrated judgement based on the sources, not measurement, and are revised as new information arrives. Not investment advice.
Original publication: hornreview.org · 23 September 2026
This page summarises the institution's view and does not reflect the view of Talay Insight. No direct quotation is used.