
IV Macro Policy & Sovereign DebtSouth Asia
TBS argues Bangladesh's IMF programme must deliver bank repair, not money
- Institution
- The Business Standard (TBS)
- Author
- Fahim Chowdhury
- Country · language
- Bangladesh · English
- Affiliation
- Independent business daily
Summary
The investment banker Fahim Chowdhury, writing in Dhaka's The Business Standard on 22 October, argues that the new IMF programme matters less for its money than for what it proves. Reported at about 4.5 billion dollars, the facility would show investors that the government is still able to reform. He recounts that the Finance Minister declared the conditions unacceptable on 4 October and said the programme had been cancelled. Twelve days later, in Bangkok, the same minister called the proposals acceptable in principle. Moody's moved the outlook to stable in September, while treating the IMF relationship as important support for external financing.
Chowdhury wants Dhaka to reach staff-level agreement with the IMF before it prices its first international sovereign bond, an issue of up to 1 billion dollars. Any extra cost conceded at issuance, he warns, is then paid over the whole life of the paper. He recalls that Pakistan returned to the Eurobond market in 2014, during its 2013 programme. The OGDCL share offer of November 2014 drew demand for only half the deal and was withdrawn. For Chowdhury that episode shows how an asset sale brought to market unprepared can destroy value.
The piece makes 3 recommendations. It wants staff-level agreement before the bond, a published assessment of bank capital needs ahead of IMF Board approval, and a single large privatisation chosen on commercial grounds. Chowdhury stresses that the capital shortfall of the banks and the bill the taxpayer will meet are not the same number, and that the public cost belongs openly in the budget. He also concedes that privatisation proceeds are one-off and cannot substitute for revenue reform.
Blind spot
The piece gives no figure at all for the size of the bank capital shortfall, and it leaves the content of the IMF's conditions at the level of what is 'reportedly' demanded. The author is an investment banker who has advised on privatisations and sovereign issues in Pakistan and Türkiye, which explains a view that puts market access first. The pressure the energy shock places on the budget and on reserves goes undiscussed.
Talay assessment
Bottom line
Bangladesh's swing between the refusal of 4 October and the acceptance of 16 October shows that an IMF programme still works as a credibility anchor for investors. The sequence the article proposes, an IMF agreement first and a bond afterwards, is the most defensible way to cap the cost of borrowing. The most likely path is staff-level agreement towards the end of the year, with the bond issued once that deal is in place.
Likely effects
- Sovereign borrowingNegative1–6 months
A first bond of 1 billion dollars priced before an IMF deal carries an uncertainty premium for its whole life.
- Banking sectorUncertain6 months+
A published capital assessment would speed the restructuring of troubled banks while making the public cost visible.
- Investor perceptionNegativeWeeks
A government that changed its mind on the IMF within 12 days keeps a question mark over policy predictability alive.
Possibilities, ranked
- 1IMF first, bond second55%
Dhaka reaches staff-level agreement towards the end of the year and issues the bond afterwards.
Watch: An IMF mission announcing staff-level agreement
- 2Bond brought forward30%
Financing needs push the bond to be priced before the IMF deal is complete, and the cost rises.
Watch: The Finance Ministry naming arranger banks and a date for the bond
- 3Talks break down again15%
Bank repair conditions meet political resistance and the government again backs away from the programme.
Watch: A fresh statement by the Finance Minister rejecting the IMF conditions
Probabilities are calibrated judgement based on the sources, not measurement, and are revised as new information arrives. Not investment advice.
Original publication: tbsnews.net · 22 October 2026
This page summarises the institution's view and does not reflect the view of Talay Insight. No direct quotation is used.